Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / Residential Construction / Supreme Court douses WBA sprinkler lawsuit

Supreme Court douses WBA sprinkler lawsuit

Sean Ryan
[email protected]

In the aftermath of its failed lawsuit, the Wisconsin Builders Association is debating whether to keep fighting state rules requiring fire sprinklers in apartment buildings.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court rejected a WBA appeal in a lawsuit challenging Wisconsin Department of Commerce rules requiring sprinklers in residential buildings with more than three units. The state since March 2008 has required sprinklers in buildings with more than eight units, but smaller projects with eight or fewer apartments or condos will be hit hardest, said Brad Boycks, WBA director of government and political affairs.

The rules will not affect buildings with fewer than eight units until 2011.

“Those smaller units were really the ones that we wanted (to exempt),” Boycks said. “When you require four-plexes and eight-plexes to be sprinklered, especially in rural communities and small communities, you are going to make a big difference in the price.”

The association estimated in late 2006 requiring sprinklers in a three- or four-unit building could add between $14,000 and $50,000 to the cost of the building.

But fire-prevention associations argue the increase is tempered by savings in other parts of the building, said Dan Gengler, north central regional manager of the National Fire Sprinkler Association. Sprinklers reduce the expense caused by fires, he said, such as environmental damage from smoke and the cost of constructing new buildings.

“If a building burns to the point where it can’t be occupied,” he said, “it gets torn down.”

Cost questions aside, it’s worth the price to protect building residents and firefighters, said Gengler, a retired department chief of the Milwaukee Fire Department. He offered, as an example, a fire that hit a four-unit building at the corner of 44th Street and North Avenue in Milwaukee on Dec. 24, 1994. The building did not have sprinklers, and firefighter Lionel Hoffer died when he got trapped in the building basement after the first and second floors collapsed.

“It’s not as simple as, ‘Hey, it costs too much,’” Gengler said. “It’s not that simple. I understand that argument and respect that argument, but if somebody had a cure for cancer, would you pay?”

The WBA’s leadership will meet Thursday to consider its next move, which might be to ask the state Legislature to reverse Commerce’s rules, said WBA President Douglas Scott, president of Amwood Homes Inc. and Advantage Homes Inc., both based in Janesville. Any lobbying attempt would face opposition from the governor’s office and fire-prevention associations, he said.

But the WBA lawsuit was about more than just sprinkler rules, Scott said. The lawsuit also challenged Commerce’s ability to change state rules covered in statutes, he said.

“There is a pattern that the Department of Commerce is changing laws with rules and that’s why the WBA pursued this,” Scott said. “We do not feel the Department of Commerce should change what the laws have been.”

The WBA has the same concern about Commerce’s new rules, unveiled March 2, requiring contractors to get state certified by July 1, Scott said. But the Wisconsin Supreme Court decision on sprinklers does not bode well for the potential to challenge the certification rules, he said.

“The Supreme Court would probably also think that (Commerce) could implement contractor licenses,” Scott said. “There are other implications for what the outcome of the sprinkler decision was.”


  1. Isn’t it time that home builders understand that it isn’t the building that is important but the people who live and visit inside of these buidlings. Fire Sprinklers should be included in all structures and should become the best fire prevention and life saving features available. Why wait for 50 years of failure when we know how to solve the problem today? How many more firefighters or citizens are we going to needlessly kill because home builders don’t get the true importance of saving lives? How many more burned children do I have to see at Burn Camp each summer? Let’s stop this insanity and mandate fire sprinklers in all Wisconsin buidlings that are built and give incentives to retrofit existing buildings.

    Chief Bill Bouma
    South Shore Fire Dept.
    6200 Durand Ave.
    Racine, WI 53406

  2. Chief Bouma obviously knows nothing about money. It really doesn’t grow on trees. Really! Maybe we should cut out the fire department completely and give the funds to the people putting in the sprinklers. It makes about as much sense as forcing people who don’t have the funds to do just that.

  3. Chief Bill Bouma

    Actually Kris, I know more about money than you think. I know what it costs to put burned kids through burn camp for just 1 week in the summer. Would you want one of your children to have to experience that or would you want them to be safe and healthly for a long life. Smoke detectors were thought of the same as sprinklers when they came out. They should be in every home now but they don’t put out the fire, only warn that there is a fire already started. Firefighters are the only profession that I know of who tries to put themselves out of work. That way no kids would have to endure the hardships of burn injuries. In many countries, builders of homes and buiildings are held to higher standards than here in the U.S. and actually face jail time if their products or building are responsible for someone’s life. The same should apply here. It is not just about the money, it is about the value of human lives.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *