Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / Government / States finding tough climate for gas tax proposals

States finding tough climate for gas tax proposals

By Brian Witte
Associated Press

ANNAPOLIS, Md. — As if gas prices weren’t high enough, several states across the U.S. are looking to raise fuel taxes they say are needed to pay for roads and bridges that are outdated, congested and in some cases, dangerous.

Maryland’s governor is proposing a phased-in 6 percent sales tax by 2 percent a year, which would raise about $613 million annually when fully implemented. Iowa is considering raising its 21-cent-a-gallon tax by either 8 cents or 10 cents.

Such proposals were hard to even contemplate during the recession and its immediate aftermath. Now, states forced to grapple with the problem are running into record-high gas prices for this time of year and lingering effects of the recession.

In Maryland, lawmakers are questioning whether the time is right for such an increase, which never is popular even in good fiscal times.

“They understand that it’s needed,” said Delegate Tawanna Gaines, a Democrat. The average price of gas pushed toward $3.80 a gallon last week. “They get that, but they basically believe that you can’t get blood out of a turnip. It’s going to be a very, very tough sell.”

Maryland Gov. Martin O’Malley, a Democrat, is quick to point out that the state hasn’t raised its gas tax since 1992, and the flat tax doesn’t buy nearly as much as it once did. But some lawmakers say they are getting significant pushback from residents who are calling their offices to express opposition at a time when Maryland, like most other states, still is trying to bounce back from the recession.

O’Malley’s plan would delay a 2 percent annual increase if gas prices rise by more than 15 percent in a fiscal year. Lawmakers also say Maryland’s $1.1 billion deficit is creating another obstacle, because his challenging budget plan includes a variety of other tax increases that legislators will be considering.

Other states also are looking at increasing revenue streams for transportation projects after years of neglect.

Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder, a Republican, is calling on lawmakers in his state to raise $1.4 billion more for transportation needs. In Arkansas, voters might be asked to consider raising two taxes to help pay for the state’s roads. In Iowa, a commission named by Republican Gov. Terry Branstad recommended last year that the fuel tax be increased.

In Michigan, state lawmakers in both parties are considering higher fuel-related taxes and vehicle registration fees to raise more than $1 billion of the $1.4 billion the governor is seeking. Rep. Rick Olson, a Republican who supports the revenue increases, contends it’s a matter of trying to avoid larger expenses later, if maintenance is deferred.

“It’s certainly going to be difficult, and no one argues that we need $1.4 billion,” Olson said. “The longer we wait, the more it is going to cost us.”

In both Maryland and Michigan, business groups have been supportive of raising revenue for transportation.

Rich Studley, president of the Michigan Chamber of Commerce, said Michigan’s transportation system was crucial to three top industries in the state, including manufacturing, agribusiness and tourism.

“It’s really, from a Chamber of Commerce perspective, all about jobs and the economy,” Studley said.

Kathy Snyder, Maryland’s Chamber of Commerce president, also is backing a revenue increase in Maryland. However, she said the chamber would rather phase in a 10-cent increase to the state’s flat tax, instead of O’Malley’s phase-in of a sales tax.

“Transportation funding is one of the top priorities of the Maryland chamber again this year,” Snyder said. “Like many states, we don’t have enough funding to build any road, bridge, highway or transit project either from state funds or federal funds.”

An Arkansas constitutional amendment that lawmakers have placed on the November ballot will ask voters to approve a temporary, half-cent sales tax to pay for the state’s highways. The sales-tax measure is part of a highway plan calling for an increase in the state’s diesel tax, which the Legislature approved last year. That plan was scaled back when the state’s trucking lobby withdrew its support and said voters would not approve a tax increase. Instead, voters approved extending a $575 million highway bond program in November.

A second proposal in Arkansas would raise the state’s severance tax on natural gas to pay for highways.

A former natural-gas executive has until July 6 to submit more than 62,000 signatures to place his proposal on the November ballot. It would increase the severance tax to 7 percent. Wells now are taxed at between 1.25 percent and 5 percent of the value of the gas being taken from the land.

In Iowa, a commission recommended late last year that the fuel tax be increased by 8 cents to 10 cents a gallon. Iowa has gone even longer than Maryland in increasing its 21cents-a-gallon tax, which last was raised in 1989. Branstad reacted by saying there was no need to increase the tax this year, and instead told state transportation officials to identify $50 million in savings that could be diverted to road projects. They have done so.

Some Iowa lawmakers think that’s inadequate, however, and committees in both the House and Senate are debating a fuel-tax increase.

Branstad continues to say he’s focused on finding efficiency but refuses to issue a veto threat that would halt debate immediately. Republicans run the House and top leaders there have the power to block debate, but they have yet to do so. Democrats run the state’s Senate, and they say the issue will proceed only if it gets broad support from Republicans.

Interest groups pushing the issue say there are enough votes to approve the increase, with the only remaining question being if an adequate level of Republican support can be found to avoid the issue being used against Democrats in November. All sides say they will need some signal from Branstad that he will approve the measure, even if it only comes privately.

In Maryland, O’Malley focused much of his State of the State speech on the need to make tough budget choice in order to find money that would help create construction jobs and maintain transportation infrastructure crucial to economic development in the suburbs of the nation’s capital, which has some of the worst traffic in the nation.

“To create jobs, a modern economy requires modern investments,” O’Malley said in the Feb. 1 speech. “Investments by all of us, for all of us.”

O’Malley’s chief of staff, Matthew Gallagher, has been meeting with lawmakers to underscore the gas tax measure’s “breaking mechanism,” which would defer any increase in fiscal years when the price of gas increases by more than 15 percent. Gallagher said the administration anticipated concern about price volatility and included the slowdown to allay worries.

“I think there is an awareness about the significant need for funding and an awareness that nothing has happened on this in 20 years,” Gallagher said.

Studley, who is optimistic there will be a window of opportunity to pass legislation in Michigan this year, noted the challenges of previous years, when lawmakers have told him to come back with the proposal when it’s not an election year or when gas prices are not high.

“Sometimes, working on this issue,” Studley said, “is kind of like going into that friendly neighborhood tavern, where everybody knows your name and the sign behind the bar says, ‘Free beer tomorrow,’ which sounds good, but tomorrow never comes.”

Copyright 2023 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *