Home / Commercial Construction / Michigan, Enbridge reach deal to boost safety of pipelines (UPDATE)

Michigan, Enbridge reach deal to boost safety of pipelines (UPDATE)

AP Environmental Writer

TRAVERSE CITY, Mich. (AP) — Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder and the Canadian oil-transport company Enbridge Inc. announced a timeline Monday for determining the future of twin pipelines beneath the channel linking lakes Huron and Michigan.

The options include shutting down the lines or routing them through a tunnel beneath the lakebed on which they now rest.

The plan calls for reaching a final agreement by Aug. 15, 2018. The pipes in question lie beneath the Straits of Mackinac, a 5-mile-long scenic waterway with high value to the tourist industry and Great Lakes. They are part of Enbridge’s Line 5, which carries nearly 23 million gallons  of oil and liquid natural gas daily across northern Wisconsin and Michigan to refineries in Sarnia, Ontario.

The company has repeatedly insisted the underwater section installed in 1953 is in good condition and has never leaked. However, state officials and environmental groups have expressed alarm over recent disclosures of gaps in its exterior layer of protective enamel coating and unsupported spaces beneath the pipes.

“Business as usual by Enbridge is not acceptable and we are going to ensure the highest level of environmental safety standards are implemented to protect one of Michigan’s most valuable natural resources,” Snyder said.

The Republican governor’s administration has resisted critics’ demands to order that the lines be decommissioned, but that option “is still on the table,” said Valerie Brader, executive director of the Michigan Agency for Energy.

“Today’s agreement does not represent a final decision by the state regarding Line 5, but instead provides a clear schedule on which a decision will either be reached cooperatively with Enbridge or the state will take another path,” Brader said.

Although the federal government regulates oil pipelines, Michigan owns the lake bottom and has granted an easement to the company allowing the pipeline to go there.

Enbridge officials acknowledged that public confidence in the safety of Line 5 has eroded and apologized for what they described as poor communication with the public about their inspections and studies.

“Trust is earned, and while we have a long way to go, we remain committed to doing what it takes to rebuild trust and uphold our pledge to protect the environment while safely meeting Michigan’s energy needs,” said Guy Jarvis, executive vice president and president for liquids pipelines.

While not ruling out a permanent shutdown, the agreement calls for a series of steps intended to boost the underwater pipes’ safety.

Among them is a procedure for temporarily halting the flow of oil during storms that produce sustained waves that are at least 8 feet high for longer than an hour, the level at which Brader said the recovery of spilled oil becomes “extraordinarily hard.”

Enbridge also agreed to decide by June 2018 which of three options for routing the underwater section is best. The options would have the section go either through a tunnel or trench, on or beneath the lakebed — either by using the existing pipes or building a new one.

The company promised steps to prevent the lines from being damaged by a ship anchor, to expedite monitoring of the pipelines with cameras or other devices, and to speed up methods for detecting potential ruptures and responding to spills.

Additionally, Enbridge said it would replace another section of Line 5 running beneath a section of the St. Clair River crossing the U.S.-Canadian border. Provided the necessary federal and state permits are acquired, the replacement would be a new pipe inside a tunnel.

The agreement comes as Michigan agencies are taking public comments on a consultant’s report listing six long-term possibilities for the Straits of Mackinac segment, including the tunnel alternative, which it estimated would cost about $150 million. While not endorsing any particular option, the report described a tunnel as more feasible than other alternatives, such as moving Line 5’s oil through other existing pipeline networks.

Environmental groups said the deal appears to tip the scales in favor of a tunnel instead of halting all movement of oil through the straits, which they argued is the only foolproof way to protect the lakes. Other measures in the plan would do little good, they said.

“Instead of shutting down this dangerous pipeline, our state leaders continue to place an enormous amount of trust in Enbridge to operate it responsibly — even while the company continues to repeatedly break that trust,” said Lisa Wozniak, executive director of the Michigan League of Conservation Voters.
State Attorney General Bill Schuette, who has called for eventually shutting down Line 5, said the agreement was “a good step forward.”

Copyright 2018 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *