Quantcast
Home / Environment / Study: flood control engineering likely has worsened floods

Study: flood control engineering likely has worsened floods

This photo released by NASA, and taken from the International Space Station, shows the Mississippi River spilling over its banks in Arkansas and Tennessee in May 2011. Flood control work along the Mississippi River and its tributaries has likely made floods worse in Mississippi and Louisiana, according to a study reported in the journal Nature. Other scientists are not convinced. (NASA via AP)

This photo released by NASA, and taken from the International Space Station, shows the Mississippi River spilling over its banks in Arkansas and Tennessee in May 2011. Flood control work along the Mississippi River and its tributaries has likely made floods worse in Mississippi and Louisiana, according to a study reported in the journal Nature. Other scientists are not convinced. (NASA via AP)

By JANET McCONNAUGHEY
Associated Press

NEW ORLEANS (AP) — Flood-control work in the Mississippi River and its tributaries has most likely made floods worse in Mississippi and Louisiana, researchers say.

Looking back at 500 years of data from tree rings and from sediment in oxbow lakes — bends that once were part of the Mississippi River but became lakes when the river changed its path slightly — researchers say the river has flooded more often and poured more water into those states over the past 150 years than in any previous period.

Climate change may be responsible for about a quarter of the difference, they estimate. Engineering work, such as that used to build levees and provide a straighter, narrow channel for navigation, is likely responsible for the rest, researchers from Massachusetts, Illinois, Alabama, South Carolina, Texas and Liverpool, England, say in the journal Nature.

Some outside scientists praised the entire paper. Others had compliments for the “paleoflood” work but expressed doubts about the conclusion that flood engineering is the main reason floods are worse.

Samuel Munoz, a lead researcher at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, said he had expected to find that previous floods were greater than more recent floods — not because the river was unrestrained, but because other research had covered a fairly recent period.

“I just expected that, given more time, you would see events that were bigger,” he said. “Because there’s a longer perspective, there’s more chance for something really big to happen.”

The researchers said climate variability, particularly the multi-decade changes in the North Atlantic’s surface temperature, has played a big part in flooding over the centuries. However, they said, changes in such cycles would predict a much smaller increase than has occurred since 1800.

“The other likely culprit is something we’ve done to the river or basin,” Munoz said. The Mississippi River Basin drains all or part of 31 states and two Canadian provinces.

“Their palaeoflood record is compelling. … And if the authors are correct, and collective efforts to subdue the Mississippi have inadvertently pushed it to rise higher than ever, then the time might have come to consider loosening its restraints,” Scott St. George of the University of Minnesota wrote in a companion commentary.

However, he wrote, he thinks climate change could be the main driver. Testing that hypothesis will require more work like Munoz’s along the upper Mississippi and its main tributaries, he said. Munoz said he and his colleagues are working on such studies.

“We have records we’re working on now from the Missouri River, the Ohio River and the Arkansas River — the big tributaries of the Mississippi. … We’re also doing this in the Houston area to put Hurricane Harvey into context,” Munoz said.

Such work isn’t possible on the upper Mississippi, where locks and dams have permanently submerged oxbow lakes, he said.
Upmanu Lall, director of the Columbia Water Center at Columbia University, said the work linking “floodiness” to climate cycles over five centuries holds water.

But the connection to river engineering is weak, Lall said. For one thing, he said, recent floods have included some very low as well as very high floods, but small floods probably didn’t leave sediment or tree-ring records. The recent flood analysis also doesn’t offer any formal analysis of likely causes and ignores whether increased rainfall or changes in the landscape, such as drainage project undertaken on Midwestern farms, might be among them, he said.

Nicholas Pinter of Southern Illinois University at Carbondale said the study confirms and underscores what he described as extensive work he and others have done about flood frequency and magnitude over the past 100 to 150 years, as well as modeling studies that look forward.

It’s particularly notable that the study found large increases “along a stretch of the Mississippi that previous research has among the LEAST impacts of river engineering on flood levels,” he wrote in an email. “If the same research had been completed on the Middle Mississippi, the Lower Missouri, or parts of the Upper Mississippi, the increases in flood magnitudes and frequencies would have been MUCH greater.”

Munoz studied three oxbow lakes: Lake Mary, west of Woodville, Mississippi; False River Lake, northwest of Baton Rouge, Louisiana; and Lake St. John, in Louisiana about north-northwest of Natchez, Mississippi.

The scientists also used tree-ring data from a 2015 study by University of Alabama scientist Matthew Therrell, including three floods not described in that report.

Copyright 2018 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*