Quantcast
Home / Government / Wisconsin appeals court restores laws from lame-duck session

Wisconsin appeals court restores laws from lame-duck session

By TODD RICHMOND Associated Press

MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A Wisconsin appeals court on Wednesday reinstated laws Republicans passed during a lame-duck session to weaken the Democratic governor and attorney general, but the statutes remain blocked because of a ruling in a separate case.

Republicans passed the legislation in December after Tony Evers defeated Gov. Scott Walker and Josh Kaul defeated Attorney General Brad Schimel in the November midterm elections. The laws were designed to weaken Evers and Kaul and guarantee Republicans could defend in court GOP-backed statutes that Evers and Kaul don’t support.

Various liberal-leaning groups have challenged the laws in separate lawsuits. Last week, Dane County Circuit Judge Richard Niess blocked the statutes, finding lawmakers had convened the Legislature illegally when they passed the bills.

The 3rd District Court of Appeals essentially wiped out that ruling Wednesday by granting the GOP lawmakers’ request for a stay. The court said Niess underestimated Republicans’ chances for success on appeal as well as the harm that blocking potentially valid legislation could cause.

Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald and Assembly Speaker Robin Vos issued a joint statement Wednesday praising the decision, saying the rule of law has prevailed. Evers issued a statement saying he’s confident the lame-duck laws will ultimately fall.

But on Tuesday, another Dane County judge, Frank Remington, cited different grounds, stemming from a separate lawsuit, to invalidate parts of the laws that directly affect Evers and Kaul. That ruling stands despite the appeals court’s stay, which means the affected provisions remain unenforceable.

The laws prohibit Evers from withdrawing from lawsuits without legislative approval, a move designed to prevent him from fulfilling a campaign pledge to pull Wisconsin out of a multistate lawsuit challenging the Affordable Care Act. The laws prevent Kaul from settling lawsuits without legislative approval and require him to deposit settlement awards in the state general fund rather than in state Department of Justice accounts.

The measures also call on state agencies, by July, to review publications explaining how they interpret state law or else take the documents down; allow lawmakers to suspend agency regulations more than once; and grant the Legislature the right to intervene in lawsuits with its own attorneys rather than use Kaul’s DOJ lawyers. Before the laws were enacted, the Legislature had to ask a judge for permission to intervene.

Republicans also confirmed 82 of Walker’s appointments during the lame-duck session.

Niess’ ruling blocking the legislation stems from a lawsuit a coalition of liberal-leaning groups filed. They allege that the laws were passed during an illegal extraordinary session.

Extraordinary sessions are previously unscheduled floor periods called by the majority party. The groups contend the Legislature can meet only according to dates it adopts at the beginning of each biennium or at the call of the governor.

Empowered by Niess’ ruling, Evers has asked Kaul to pull the state out of the Affordable Care Act lawsuit and has rescinded all 82 appointments Walker made during the extraordinary session. The Republicans’ attorney, Misha Tseytlin, said in an email Wednesday evening that he believes the stay means all the appointees now have their jobs back.

Jeffrey Mandell, an attorney for the coalition, said the groups are disappointed with the stay but remain confident they’ll defeat any appeal filed by Republicans. He didn’t respond to a follow-up email asking about the appointees’ status.

Remington’s ruling, meanwhile, is part of a separate lawsuit brought by a group of unions.

They allege the laws violate the separation of powers between the legislative and executive branches. Remington issued a preliminary injunction on Tuesday blocking the provisions preventing the Evers administration from withdrawing from and settling lawsuits without the Legislature’s approval, calling for the review of official publications by July and allowing lawmakers to suspend agency rules more than once. At the same time, he let stand language granting legislators the right to intervene in actions.

Republicans have said they plan to appeal that ruling. Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald and Assembly Speaker Robin Vos issued a joint statement Wednesday praising the stay, saying the rule of law has prevailed.

“A judge should not violate the Legislature’s basic ability to convene when its duly elected members call a session day,” they said.

Copyright 2019 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*