Quantcast
Home / Commercial Construction / Trump signs orders making it harder to block pipelines

Trump signs orders making it harder to block pipelines

President Donald Trump takes a tour on April 10 of the International Union of Operating Engineers' International Training and Education Center in Crosby, Texas, before speaking about the important of energy and infrastructure. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

President Donald Trump takes a tour on April 10 of the International Union of Operating Engineers’ International Training and Education Center in Crosby, Texas, before speaking about the important of energy and infrastructure. (AP Photo/Evan Vucci)

By DARLENE SUPERVILLE and KEVIN FREKING Associated Press

CROSBY, Texas (AP) — President Donald Trump’s support for shifting more power to states faded on Wednesday next to his affinity for oil and gas production, as he aimed to make it harder for states to cite environmental concerns as a reason to block pipelines and other energy projects.

At the urging of business groups, Trump signed two executive orders designed to speed up oil- and gas-pipeline projects. The action came after officials in Washington state and New York have used permitting procedures to stop new energy projects in recent years, prompting complaints from Republican members of Congress and the fossil-fuel industry.

“Too often badly needed energy infrastructure is being held back by special interest groups, entrenched bureaucracies and radical activists,” Trump complained before signing the orders.

The Trump administration insisted it was not trying to take power away from the states but, rather, trying to make sure that state actions follow the intent of the Clean Water Act.

Under a section of the law, companies must get certification from the state before moving ahead with an energy project.

In 2017, Washington state blocked the construction of a coal terminal, saying the project would have had too many harmful effects, including air pollution, rail dangers and vehicle traffic.

In New York, regulators stopped work on a natural gas pipeline, saying it failed to meet standards to protect streams, wetlands and other water resources.

Less than a week ago, nearly a dozen business groups told Andrew Wheeler, administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency Administrator, that the environmental review and permitting process for energy projects “has become a target for environmental activists and states that oppose the production and use of fossil fuels.”

The groups said in a letter dated April 5 that individual states shouldn’t be able to use provisions of the Clean Water Act “to dictate national policy, thereby harming other states and the national interest and damaging cooperative federalism.”

Trump singled out New York for his harshest criticism, saying “obstruction” by the state “was hurting the country.”

New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, a Democrat, called Trump’s executive order a gross overreach that would undermine his state’s ability to protect water quality and the environment.

“States must have a role in the process for siting energy infrastructure like pipelines, and any efforts to curb this right to protect our residents will be fought tooth and nail,” Cuomo said.

Washington Gov. Jay Inslee, a candidate for the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination, issued a joint statement with the Washington attorney general, Bob Ferguson, calling the executive orders “an unprecedented assault on the right and obligation of every state to protect their waters and their communities.”

“We intend to challenge any attempt by the administration to illegally constrain Washington’s authority to protect our state’s natural resources,” the governor and attorney general said.

One of Trump’s executive orders calls for the EPA to consult states, tribes and others before issuing new guidance and rules for states on how to comply with the Clean Water Act.

The order also directs the transportation secretary to propose a rule allowing liquefied natural gas to be shipped in approved rail-tank cars, and directs the labor secretary to review whether investment-fund managers who invest in order to further social goals are fulfilling their responsibility to maximize shareholder returns.

Environmental groups described Trump’s order as an effort to short-circuit a state’s ability to review complicated projects. The environmental group Center for Biological Diversity said the orders would mark the fourth time Trump has used executive actions to streamline permits for fossil-fuel infrastructure.

“Trump’s developing an addiction to executive orders that rubber-stamp these climate-killing projects,” said Brett Hartl, the center’s government affairs director.

Trump has linked increasing gas and oil production in the U.S. with the creation of jobs and a reduction in fuel prices for consumers. He signed the orders while visiting the International Union of Operating Engineers International Training and Education Center, a union-run facility northeast of Houston.

Trade groups representing the oil and gas industry applauded the orders and said greater access to natural gas benefits families and the environment.

“When states say ‘no’ to the development of natural gas pipelines, they force utilities to curb safe and affordable service and refuse access to new customers, including new businesses,” said Karen Harbert, president and CEO at the American Gas Association.

The second executive order is designed to ease permitting procedures for energy projects that cross international borders.

Currently, the secretary of state has the authority to issue permits for cross-border infrastructure such as pipelines. The executive order clarifies that the president will make the decision on whether to issue such permits.

The changes follows on Trump’s decision last month to issue a new presidential permit for the long-stalled Keystone XL oil pipeline — two years after he first approved it and more than a decade after it was first proposed.

Trump signed the orders in between campaign fundraisers in San Antonio and Houston, events that were expected to net at least $6 million both for Trump’s re-election effort and the Republican Party.

Copyright 2019 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*