By CHRIS HUBBUCH
Wisconsin State Journal
SAUK PRAIRIE, Wis (AP) — Nestled in the hills southeast of Baraboo, Hemlock Draw is like a time capsule from Mother Nature.
Descending roughly 300 feet into a gorge carved by water over millions of years, past quartzite outcrops that once stood as islands in a prehistoric sea, the oak and maple forests of southern Wisconsin give way to yellow birch, white pine and hemlock.
Typically found in northern Wisconsin, these trees are relics of the last ice age, when polar ice sheets ended just a few miles to the east.
The glacier that covered most of Wisconsin — but not the southwest corner — retreated more than 10,000 years ago as global temperatures warmed by about 5 degrees Celsius. But on the shaded slopes of this gorge, conditions remained cool enough for those species to hang on.
Scientists think those same geological features that made southwest Wisconsin biologically resilient during the last period of climate change can help preserve biodiversity in the coming decades of unprecedented global warming, the State Journal reported.
Over the past decade, a team of scientists working with The Nature Conservancy analyzed geographical and topographical data across the United States to identify and map landscapes like the Baraboo Hills that they believe will be key to helping species survive.
Now the global nonprofit organization has made that data publicly available through an online mapping tool that will allow government agencies, nongovernmental organizations, private landowners and local leaders to develop conservation strategies that focus limited resources on the most valuable land.
“Conservation isn’t about preserving it all,” said Nick Miller, director of science and strategy for The Nature Conservancy in Wisconsin. “It’s about finding the best fit between people’s needs and nature’s needs. Those are interactive. People need nature and nature needs people.”
Global temperatures have risen about 1.5 degrees centigrade over the last century, according to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and are expected to rise another 2 to 4 degrees over the next century without drastic reductions in carbon emissions. By the end of the century, Wisconsin’s climate could be similar to St. Louis, according to models developed by scientists with the Wisconsin Initiative on Climate Change Impact.
That’s roughly similar to the warming the Earth experienced coming out of the last ice age between 19,000 and 8,000 year ago, said Jack Williams, a UW-Madison geologist and geographer who uses fossil records to study how species respond to climate change.
But this time around, the climate is changing much faster.
To put it in perspective, Williams says, we’re on track to “rewind the climate clock” by millions of years in just a few generations to temperatures warmer than anything in human history.
As the climate changes, plants and animals move to adapt.
Studies have found species are already moving an average of 11 miles north and 36 feet higher in elevation each decade to find more hospitable places.
Birds native to the southeast, like the tufted titmouse and Carolina wren, are now common in Wisconsin, and the southern flying squirrel has pushed north, displacing northern flying squirrels. Some types of oak and sycamore trees native to Iowa are now growing in Madison and even Minneapolis, said Lee Frelich, director of the University of Minnesota Center for Forest Ecology, and red maple are being found in Minnesota’s Boundary Waters.
“Climate change is happening about 10 times faster than the recovery after the ice age,” said Ryan O’Connor, a conservation ecologist with the DNR who served on a technical advisory committee for the project. “Species just can’t keep up.”
Scientists on The Nature Conservancy study found a strong correlation between geological diversity and biological diversity. Places with steep slopes, deep ravines and different types of soil tend to harbor lots of microclimates where species can find the right temperatures, water, nutrients and shelter they require.
“All these little nooks and crannies across the landscapes are incredibly important for helping species survive,” Miller said. “Resilience comes from complexity. There are many different options.”
In a flat landscape, species might have to move about 100 kilometers north for every degree the climate warms, O’Connor said. In a hilly landscape, they might only have to move a couple hundred feet.
“This tool helps identify where those places are,” O’Connor said.
With nearly 60% of U.S. lands and waters fragmented by human development, The Nature Conservancy study also shows the value of natural corridors that allow species to find new homes.
“There’s nothing wrong with humans on the landscape,” O’Connor said. “But if we want to keep these species on the landscape, how can they get from point A to point B?”
Wisconsin’s most resilient and connected landscapes, as identified by the study, include places like the Baraboo Range and the greater Driftless area, a 24,000-square-mile wedge of steep hills and valleys that, left mostly untouched by glaciers, straddles Wisconsin, Minnesota and Iowa.
Other important places include the Kettle Moraine, a glacial formation that provides a north-south corridor with varied habitats, and the Northwoods, which has vast areas of undeveloped land.
“Species have adapted to past climate changes. One of the ways they do so is there are often microclimates,” Williams said. “Maybe those species won’t persist there, but maybe other species threatened by climate change could persist in this microclimate.”
Miller said scientists’ models could help conserve the sorts of natural resources that will be most valuable 50 or 100 years from now, including designated State Natural Areas like Hemlock Draw and Baxter’s Hollow, both owned and maintained for public use by The Nature Conservancy.
“Climate change is a big risk,” O’Connor said. “But it’s also a big unknown.”
That leaves resource managers — both public and private — unsure how to best manage the public trust, especially with their finite time and resources.
“This doesn’t answer that question explicitly,” O’Connor said. “But it gives a big piece of the puzzle to help figure out where on the landscape is your biggest bang for your buck.”
Jane Anklam, a conservation manager at the Landmark Conservancy in northwest Wisconsin, said scientists’ work is providing access to data that in the past have been difficult or impossible to find. She hopes their work will allow her organization to be more deliberate in choosing which land to preserve.
“The land trust might say we’re protecting this land (so) it’s got to be good (land),” Anklam said. “Now we can say that we’re getting the data from the researchers.”
Scientists’ models could also help identify valuable working lands, O’Connor said. “It doesn’t necessarily mean every area that’s an important corridor … has to become a state park or be preserved by the state.”
The Nature Conservancy has also shared its models with solar-power developers in the hopes that they will use them to avoid lands least susceptible to the effects of climate change. Miller said the work isn’t just about protecting nature.
The same lands that support biodiversity also contribute to the health and well-being of people — providing clean drinking water, mitigating flooding and even sucking carbon dioxide from the atmosphere.
Then there’s their scenic beauty.
“I think it’s really important as a strategy for preserving landscapes,” Williams said. “The landscapes we find most beautiful … also turn out to be good habitat for preserving species. There’s a nice kind of double win there.”