Quantcast
Home / Commentary / OPINION: A mainstream perspective on prevailing wage

OPINION: A mainstream perspective on prevailing wage

Andrew Disch

Andrew Disch

Recently a spokesperson for Wisconsin Manufacturers & Commerce told the Wisconsin State Journal, “We don’t want to make it too comfortable to remain unemployed.”

Currently, the maximum weekly unemployment benefit is $370. Who would describe $370 a week as “comfortable?” Similarly, the president of the Associated Builders and

Contractors has cited “inflated wages” in opposition to prevailing wage.

Are rising wages on Main Street somehow a bad thing? The perspectives from corporate special-interest groups like WMC and ABC are relevant to understanding their criticism of prevailing-wage laws.

Now for a mainstream perspective.

Prevailing-wage laws require that construction workers on public construction projects be paid wages offered on similar jobs done by local Wisconsin workers. This results in rising middle-class incomes for everyone in the state. It’s widely recognized there is a worker shortage in the trades and, in order for the next generation to pursue these careers, it needs to make financial sense. Should we expect a person who completes a multiyear apprenticeship program and performs physically demanding work in extreme conditions to be paid wages so low that they are unable to obtain a middle-class lifestyle?

Prevailing wage and Wisconsin’s low-bid law have had a close association.

Whereas opponents of prevailing wage frequently mention the “free market,” certainly they would also agree that the low-bid law falls outside this market. When building a house, most consumers conduct some investigation into the credibility of the builders submitting bids rather than simply accepting the lowest bid sight unseen. That is the free market.

Prevailing wage protects taxpayers against the high costs of shoddy contractors: lower quality, expensive delays, less local hiring and underpaid workers relying on government assistance. It ensures a level playing field among bidders within the low-bid system. It holds to account out-of-state contractors that don’t pay Wisconsin taxes or Wisconsin wages.

Since prevailing wage’s repeal, these carpetbagging shops have increased their share of public work here substantially and have taken away job opportunities from hardworking Wisconsinites.

Mainstream perspectives support prevailing wage. A recent poll showed 83% of Wisconsin voters think companies that bid on public construction work should pay good wages and benefits. Additionally, the federal prevailing-wage law, known as Davis-Bacon, receives broad support in Congress. The House of Representatives votes on this regularly and it is consistently passed with both Democratic and Republican support – one of the rare policies both parties agree on in Washington. In fact, former Republican Speaker Paul Ryan was an ardent supporter.

Embracing prevailing wage in Wisconsin reflects our values of supporting the middle class, respecting the taxpayer and standing up to extreme perspectives. It’s a mainstream policy that’s good for Main Street.

Andrew Disch is the Political Director for the North Central States Regional Council of Carpenters.

Copyright 2019 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*