Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

GOP Legislature circulating bills that would allow for design-build

GOP Legislature circulating bills that would allow for design-build

By: Nate Beck//May 22, 2019//

Listen to this article
Traffic passes in July through a section of Interstate 94 that's being rebuilt near Mount Pleasant. Republican lawmakers on Wednesday began circulating about a dozen bills dealing with transportation matters. Among other things, the proposals would allow design-build delivery on state projects. Also, rather than increasing the state's gas tax, the legislation would have a certain amount of the taxes now collected on sales of vehicles and automotive parts set aside for the state's transportation fund. (File photo by Kevin Harnack)
Traffic passes in July through a section of Interstate 94 that’s being rebuilt near Mount Pleasant. Republican lawmakers on Wednesday began circulating about a dozen bills dealing with transportation matters. Among other things, the proposals would allow delivery on state projects. Also, rather than increasing the state’s , the legislation would have a certain amount of the taxes now collected on sales of vehicles and automotive parts set aside for the state’s transportation fund. (File photo by Kevin Harnack)

Republican lawmakers on Wednesday began seeking sponsors for about a dozen transportation-related bills that could include an alternative to a gas-tax increase and allow for the use of the design-build system on highway projects.

State Rep. , a Republican from New Berlin, said at least a dozen transportation-related bills put forward by various GOP lawmakers were being circulated on Wednesday as part of a plan that lawmakers are calling the “Road to Sustainability.” The proposals could increase the tax revenue received by the while both decreasing spending on the department and instituting other policy changes.

The proposals are intended as a replacement of the transportation plan that , a Democrat, laid out earlier this year as part of his two-year budget proposal. Evers had called for increasing WisDOT spending by $608 million over the next biennium largely by increasing the state’s gas tax by as much as 10 cents a gallon by the end of the budgetary period.

Rather than raise the gas tax, Sanfelippo is proposing to have part of the taxes now collected on car and auto-parts sales be put into the state’s transportation fund.  Recent polling has suggested that the public isn’t likely to accept the prospect of paying more at the pump.

“The gas tax isn’t going to pass,” Sanfelippo said. “There’s no support for it in the legislature and people don’t want it.”

Sanfelippo previously said his plan would raise about $258 million over the next biennium and about $440 million for roads in the budget after that, according to an analysis from the nonpartisan Legislative Fiscal Bureau.

Sanfelippo said on Wednesday that he’ll most likely introduce his legislation in the next week or so. Other bills being circulated call for raising revenue for the transportation fund by increasing the state’s from $75 a year and impose accountability measures in response to defects identified in a recent Legislative Audit Bureau review of WisDOT.

Still another bill would revive a proposal to allow design-build delivery on road projects instead of the design-bid-build method used almost exclusively on Wisconsin infrastructure contracts. Supporters of design-build argue that letting contractors have influence over project designs could help catch costly flaws, saving money.

In the past, though, opposition to the design-build system has been widespread in the Wisconsin construction industry, coming from groups that are usually at odds with each other.

When Sanfelippo introduced a design-build bill in 2017, his proposal elicited opposition from both the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 139 and the Associated Builders and Contractors of Wisconsin, which represents mainly non-union contractors, were among the critics. The groups had previously opposed changes to the state’s low-bidding system and said the proposal would favor large companies with in-house design professionals.

Polls

Do you expect your business to grow revenue in 2026 vs. 2025?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Today’s News

See All Today's News

Project Profiles

See All Project Profiles